The first option is either 'Perform color management' or 'Color management on printer side'. I see slight differences in the histograms from my developed DNG files and the exported JPEG histograms but its not enough for me to worry about.ĭoes Silkypix support soft proofing? If so, that may allow you to estimate such changes in advance.Yes, there is a soft proofing option in the view settings, this is for printing. preview in LR and JPEG exported by LR ?There was a discussion on the DXO Forum about this. How can that be? Do you also see a small difference of histograms between RAW dev. preview and TIF is smaller than the difference between RAW dev.

There is still a difference between historgrams of RAW dev preview and the TIF, although the difference between RAW dev. So I exported another TIF 16bits file with the exact same processing parameters as the JPEG, and compared histograms again. I imagined the difference in histograms could come from the difference of RAW preview based on 14bits or 16bits processing in computer memory and the JPEG compression over 8bits. preview, but the histograms of the preview and the JPEG exports are also very slightly different in shadows (left side of the histogram).

I was suspecting a problem with color management or color space setting for the export vs color space for the RAW dev.

preview in Silkypix 9, I noticed a subtle difference in shadows. While exporting to JPEG file, and comparing the exported file side by side with the RAW image dev.